Ethical Decision Making

The boldness say involves Alex , a bookman of roentgen ray applied information who was having his number 1 encounter with uncomplainings in the fatality room . As a savant , he was there to learn the techniques meaty in dealing with injured patients . His concern , therefore , was to teach as much experience as he mickle learn from , following e rattling instruction given over him by his instructor , Ms . Dubois . Ms . Dubois , on the separate open , aside from be an instructor , was also the roentgen ray supervisory program of the hospital She was , therefore , performing a dual occasion and her responsibilities included teaching Alex the effective techniques in winning x-rays of emergency room patients while at the alike(p) time sightedness to it that the task was being done decently - which means winn ing the x-rays without hurting or further injuring the patients . interim , the patient in question , Mr . Hanson , was seriously injured , scarcely he was mobile . He was in the hospital motivation relief of his embodied aches , not to be subjected to more supernumerary painsIf Alex succeeded in taking the x-rays of the head and neck of Mr Hanson on his first attempt , the plight should not have occurred Therefore , his being a student should not have mattered both . however his lack of experience thrustd the patient great pain during the cardinal times that he manipulated the head and neck of Mr . Hanson to take the x-rays , giving rise to a dilemma : should the patient have been sure that the one taking his x-rays was that a studentAccording to Beauchamp and Childress who were cited by Limentani , the billet of an honest commandment is , at best , leading(predicate) facie This means that a pattern is barely adhere on all cause unless it is in conflict with equal or stronger duties In this case! study , therefore the principles of non-maleficence , beneficence , and autonomy have prima facie status . However , Ms .

Dubois clearly believed that the principles of non-maleficence and beneficence had been binding in this case so she chose not to inform the patient that Alex was only a student for fear that Mr . Hanson might frame uncorrectable and prevent them from taking the x-rays , thinking that a upright student might cause him more pain than prerequisite . Since the x-rays were very important for his treatment , Ms . Dubois could be warrant in believing that Mr . Hanson should not be given any cause for anx iety and alarm which might turn him into a ill patient and make it impossible for them to take the x-ray (Limentani . 1999 ) some other justification for Ms . Dubois run is the regulation of Double exertion of Fowler Ariff (1987 ) referred to by Mosby (n .d , that any action that could succor the patient , though painful , could be considered ethical if : the action itself is true(p) enough the performer intends only the good effect the pretty effect is not a means to a good end and a favorable balance exists between the good and bad set up Clearly , Ms . Dubois was only interested in component part Mr Hanson have the...If you want to get a full essay, install it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper