History of War Coverage Essay -- essays research papers fc

contend Coverage     Edward R. Murrow, former reporter for CBS once said, We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason if weremember that we be not descended from dread(a) men, not from men who feargond to write, to speak, to associate and to defend causes which were, for the moment unpopular. Times argon changing when it comes to the media covering wars. There was once a time in our country when journalists were not afraid to report the realities and atrocities, to a reasonable extent, that occurred during wartime. During the Vietnam infringe America saw what actually was happening in the jungle on the other side of the world and it enablight-emitting diode citizens to form their own opinions about the war. new-fashioned wars, such as the Gulf struggle and Operation Iraqi freedom do not allow the citizens of the United States to involve and experience what is truly happening. We see a sanitized versio n of the war, we are shown only natural that boosts moral and support for the troops and our government, but we do not see enough of the war to realize that everything does not go as collected as it seems. War coverage has changed over the years in numerous aspects. Freedom of the journalists, the relationship amongst the press and the military and the technology are the significant aspects of change in war coverage.     The Second universe of discourse War was covered in a way that is very different than what we are used to today. The news was aired mainly by radio because video was still in its early days during the war. The journalists and the military were more associate than enemies, with each of them helping the other. When it came to the overall purpose of the war, the US correspondents (and their Allied counterparts) were no less committed to the defeat of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan than were the commanders who led their troops into battle. As a result, the notion that our armed forces needed in some manner to "handle" the press was irrelevant. Press relations--or "media" relations, as the Pentagon would have phrased it--did not besides exist in the way we recognize them from our post-Vietnam experience (Rather). There was a sense of mutual respect between the two organizations in World War II, they both understood what they were out there to accomplish. Although the relationship between t... ...lemmas and government.Works CitedBarhart, Aaron. Speeding Up War Coverage. Television Week. Apr. 2003.     Academic inquisition Premier. EBSCOhost. U. of Hartford Lib. 1 may 2005     .     Hernandez, Debra Gersh. The simple days of war coverage. editor program &      Publisher. Jul. 1994. Academic Search Premier. EBSCOhost.     U. of Hartford Lib. 1 whitethorn 2005. .Newseum War Stories Technology. War Repor ting & Technology.      1 May 2005.     .Rather, Dan. Truth on the Battlefield. Harvard International Review.      Spring 2001. Academic Search Premier. EBSCOhost. U. of Hartford Lib.     1 May 2005. .Rosenberg, Jim. Tech from Gulf War to Gulf War. Editor & Publisher. butt on 2003. Academic Search Premier. EBSCOhost. U. of Hartford Lib. 1 May 2005. .     Shafer, Jack. Embeds and Unilaterals. 1 May 2003.           . 1 May 2005.